Which of the following is an acceptable use of force for a security officer?

Using minimal force to detain a suspect until law enforcement arrives is an acceptable use of force for a security officer. This approach is in alignment with the principles of reasonable and proportionate response. Security personnel are trained to handle situations with the least amount of force necessary, and detaining a suspect allows them to maintain safety and order while awaiting the proper authorities to take over, which is vital in maintaining legal and ethical standards.

The concept of using minimal force emphasizes the importance of preserving life and minimizing harm. Security officers receive training that encourages them to utilize non-violent methods first and to escalate to physical force only when absolutely necessary and proportionate to the threat being presented. This ensures that interactions are compliant with legal expectations and reflect the responsibility security personnel have to protect the public and themselves.

In contrast, using deadly force is generally considered inappropriate unless there is an immediate threat to life. Indiscriminate use of physical force can lead to excessive harm and legal consequences, as it flouts the principle of proportionality. Similarly, while verbal communication can be beneficial, using intimidation can escalate rather than de-escalate a situation, potentially leading to further conflict rather than resolution. Therefore, the focus on using minimal force helps ensure that security officers act within legal guidelines