Can a security officer lawfully search a person's belongings based solely on a third-party allegation of shoplifting?

The assertion that a security officer cannot lawfully search a person's belongings based solely on a third-party allegation of shoplifting is grounded in legal principles regarding search and seizure. In practice, a security officer needs more concrete evidence or observable behavior to justify a search. Mere hearsay—such as information received from a third party without direct observation of suspicious actions—does not fulfill the legal requirement for a search.

To conduct a legal search, there must typically be probable cause or reasonable suspicion based on observable evidence, not just someone else's claim. This is essential to protect individuals' rights against unwarranted searches, reflecting the balance between security enforcement and personal privacy rights. By adhering to this principle, security officers ensure that they act within the law and respect the legal standards required for searches.