If a security officer is required to file a report after discharging a firearm, which agency is NOT likely to be involved?

The Internal Company Review Board is typically not involved in external incidents like a firearm discharge unless it pertains to internal policies or procedures that the security company's management wishes to review. In situations where a security officer discharges a firearm, the primary focus is often on the legal implications and compliance with law enforcement protocols. Local law enforcement would be called to investigate the incident, as any discharge of a firearm is a serious matter that requires official documentation and inquiry.

The Department of Consumer Affairs and the State Attorney General's Office are also likely to be involved, primarily to ensure compliance with state regulations and to investigate any legal ramifications that arise. They would assess the situation based on the laws governing the use of firearms and the conduct of private security personnel.

In contrast, the Internal Company Review Board focuses more on organizational practices and internal compliance rather than on external incidents requiring law enforcement, which is why this choice stands out as the least likely agency to be involved in the aftermath of a firearm discharge.